Simgot EW300 English Review

 

Love And Sound

 

Ratings

 

Adjustment/Ergonomics
90
Accessories
80
Bass
92
Mids
88
Treble
80
Separation
78
Soundstage
78
Quality/Price
90

 

Pros

 

  • Two mouthpieces with certain enriching differences.
  • Almost canonical bass.
  • Versatile, musical, all-round, pleasant and quiet profile with golden mouthpieces.
  • Excellent quality/price ratio.
  • Very good level of construction, despite not being an alternative design within the brand.
  • Although the sound is denser, warmer and more cohesive, a good level of clarity and transparency is maintained.
  • Three finish options.
  • Good ergonomics.

 

Cons

 

  • Just a set of tips.
  • Treble extension is not the best.
  • Micro detail is somewhat limited. Can be improved in technical aspects, stage and separation.
  • No balanced cable option.

 

Purchase Link

 

https://www.linsoul.com/products/simgot-ew300

 

Link to the WEB

 

https://www.simgot.com/

 

Introduction

 

As I said recently in my review of the Simgot SuperMix 4, the Shenzen-based company is still very active. Moreover, it continues on the path of multi-hybrid IEMS creations. This time, Simgot has released a true triple driver, which mounts three different transducers (1DD+1Planar+1PZT). The brand persists in offering two types of sound using two different pairs of mouthpieces. One is Silver, made of steel and has a red washer. Its reference is the Simgot Golden 2023 curve. The copper mouthpiece with a purple washer has the H-2019 curve as its reference. It is curious, but the copper mouthpiece has been designed specifically for gamers, tailored to gaming scenarios. On the other hand, the capsule is all-metal, CNC machined from high-density alloy. It has a shiny mirror finish. Its design has been possible thanks to an exhaustive 3D analysis of the ear contour and an expert ergonomic molding, providing a perfect fit.
Also, it is curious to note that there are several versions of this model: there is the standard version, the HBB limited version, in collaboration with the famous YouTuber Hawaii Bad Boy (HBB) of BadGuyGoodAudioReviews. This version has the matte black housing, but keeps the tuning of the standard model. The other version contains a USB Type-C DSP instead of the classic 3.5mm SE audio jack. Let’s take a look at what this new Simgot model, in its standard version, has to offer.

 

 

Specifications

 

  • Type of Drivers: 1 dynamic driver + 1 planar magnetic driver + 1 piezoelectric ceramic driver.
  • Dynamic driver: Dual chamber dynamic transducer with 10mm composite ceramic diaphragm.
  • Planar magnetic driver: 6mm annular magnetic driver.
  • Frequency Response: 8Hz-40kHz.
  • Effective frequency response: 20 Hz-20 kHz.
  • Sensitivity: 121 dB/Vrms (@1 kHz, silver steel tube and red silicon ring); 119 dB/Vrms (@1 kHz, gold copper tube and purple silicon ring).
  • Impedance: 28Ω ± 15%(@1kHz)
  • Cable material: High-purity silver-plated OFC.
  • Jack Connector: STD&HBB Edition [3.5mm (without microphone)]; DSP Edition [Type-C connector (with microphone)].
  • Capsule Connection Type: 2Pin 0.78mm.
  • Launch price: $69.99.

 

 

Packaging

 

The EW300 comes in Simgot’s classic size packaging, which is 140x120x60mm in size. It is almost square and is black. On the main side there are alternating hearts and silver X’s. The logo is at the top center and the model name and drivers are at the bottom. The logo is at the top center and the model name and drivers are at the bottom right. On the rear face you can see the frequency responses of the two mouthpieces, a description of them and the specifications in several languages. Once the cover is removed, you can access the box protected by a black cardboard flap with the external face of the IEMS engraved on it in large size. Underneath, the capsules are enclosed in dense black foam. On the outside there are two transparent plastic sheets for protection. At the bottom there is a box with the accessories. The complete contents are as follows:

 

  • The two capsules.
  • One high purity silver plated OFC cable.
  • Three pairs of translucent white silicone tips with black core, sizes S*M*L.
  • One pair of copper nipples, one pair of steel nipples (already installed in the capsules).
  • Four red washers, four purple washers.
  • Six foam filter tubes.
  • One black oval zippered case.
  • Instruction manual.
  • Warranty card.

 

Although it is a continuist set of accessories, I like the zippered case and the details of accompanying washers and extra foam filters. There is only a single set of silicone tips, but I must admit that the large size is the one I usually use, filled with homemade foam, of course. Finally, the cable is the same as the brand usually uses in models of this price. Little to object, I would only like the possibility of a balanced plug option.

 

 

Construction and Design

 

I repeat what was written in the introduction: the capsules are all-metal, manufactured in high-density alloy by CNC. They have a shiny mirror finish. The external face has a shape that mixes flat parts with a lower curve. On one vertex is inscribed the brand name and on the opposite vertex is a gold-plated Torx screw. In the center is a depressed circle and each capsule has a different drawing. The right capsule has a pixelated heart and the left one has a pixelated cross. On the edge there is a hole near the 2Pin 0.78mm connection interface which is completely recessed. The inner side is composed of three levels. The first is flat and is inscribed with the model name and the letter indicating the channel. The second level starts with a step and grows in a cone shape towards the nozzles. The third tier is the mouthpieces themselves, with a length of 4.6mm, a center diameter of 5.1mm and a crown of 6.2mm. Like all alloys they have some weight, but not very noticeable in the ears. The construction is impeccable.
The cable has two coiled strands. Inside there are two wires, one black and one gold. It has a transparent PVC coating. The OFC cable is specified as high purity silver plated. The splitter piece is a black metal cylinder. The plug sleeve is the same, slightly longer, with the brand name written lengthwise. Both cylinders have whitish plastic cable outlet protectors. The plug is gold-plated 3.5mm SE. The pin is a gold-finished ring with a hole in its center. The connection interface is 2Pin 0.78mm and it is the classic one mounted on transparent rectangular pieces with a dot to determine the channel, as well as a barely visible raised letter. They have transparent ear guides. There is also a white Velcro strap with the brand’s slogan.
This is the classic Simgot cable in this price range, while the shape of the capsules is very similar to that of the EW200 model, except for the heart and the cross.

 

 

Adjustment and Ergonomics

 

The ergonomics are very good. Its flat shape on the outer face makes it integrate quite well in the ears. The curved shape of the rim fits perfectly in the pinna and its integration is very high. Once the capsules are adjusted, the movement is minimal and the discomfort is almost nonexistent, fading, even the weight of the capsules. The inclination of the nozzles is sufficient for orientation to be noticeable. The length is not long enough for the insertion to be more than superficial, hopefully, it can be average if longer tips are used. As usual, I have used my large foam-filled tips, which I make at home. With them the fit is immediate and the level of insulation is good. The seal is subtly occlusive although slight movement can spoil it. To improve it, the mouthpieces should be subtly longer.
Finally, to note that a good metal construction like this implies a light weight of each capsule. But, as I said, the good ergonomics of the model means that once in the ears, this weight is relative.

 

 

Sound

 

Profile

 

Simgot presents two mouthpieces to reproduce two profiles. It should be noted that the Silver mouthpiece, made of steel and with a red washer, makes the frequency response almost identical to that of the EW200 model. It is clear that its reference is the Simgot Golden 2023 curve. With the copper mouthpiece and purple washer, its reference is the H-2019 curve. According to the brand itself, this copper mouthpiece has been designed specifically for gamers, tailored to gaming scenarios. According to the brand’s own description: it excels in accurate sound reproduction, making it perfect for both audiovisual content and game playback. With powerful bass, precise positioning and immersive spatial effects, it ensures that crucial sounds such as gunshots and footsteps are clearly distinguished, giving it a competitive edge in the game.
Unlike the EW200 model and despite the fact that the H-2019 profile is very common, I will use the gold mouthpieces for the sound description.

 

 

Bass

 

As usual, starting in the bass with the gold-plated mouthpiece, a moderately high sub-bass boost is achieved. Simgot’s good workmanship is maintained, with a deep, punchy, relatively dry and tight low end. There is a point of springy gumminess that promotes fun, but limits the punch from being too concise, adding a point of extension and relaxing the speed. Still, the brand’s classic canonical bass behavior trend persists. The lower range feels deep, sufficiently clean, precise and non-invasive. Once again, the respect for the rest of the range is emphasized, allowing the voices to be free, even protagonists. This implies that the bass knows how to disconnect correctly from the upper frequencies, despite its power and energy. It does not reach Bass-Head level, but it is above neutrality. In my opinion, it is in that sweet spot that allows you to enjoy its quantity and power, but without overwhelming. It may be high for some, but not for me.
In the very low frequency pure tone test the ability of the brand in the lower range is manifested. The sound is pure, physical, dark, deep, with a natural behavior, subtle wave character, but not colored. It already achieved a great effect with the EW200 for a ridiculous price and redoubles the bet with the EW300 while maintaining excellent performance in the lower range. The translation when it comes to playing music is obvious, precision, technical skill, extended ability to follow various complex bass lines, remarkable competence in recreating different layers and layering bass. Of course, the EW300s pass the dirty, unfiltered bass test with flying colors. No suffering is shown, there is no sound out of naturalness, reproducing such bass accurately, including a soft but perceptible texture, very nice too, knowing how to maintain a very high and accurate resolution quality. Even, it still moves very well at high volumes, which attests to the great quality that treasures the low end of the EW300.
Finally, it should be noted that as a good bass emphasized in the sub-bass, its mid-range is not too prominent, allowing, on the one hand, to maintain a good volume of occupied space, on the other hand, to sound clean and never swollen.

 

 

Mids

 

While the bass roll-off is relatively relaxed, it seems that the midrange valley is not very pronounced. The bass possesses just enough roll-off to make the lower mids sound clean, but has enough energy to bring a slight warmth to the midrange. Again, almost 9dB separates the high end from the lower midrange. But the excitement is not very sustained in the upper mids and I think a balance has been sought when it comes to adding clarity and transparency to the sound, but respecting the smoothness, naturalness and realism of the timbre. In that respect, this is not an exalted or polarized midrange. I would delete the word “splashy” to describe the EW300s and consider using terms like “relaxed”, even “more homogeneous”. Thus, their sound is more pleasant, restrained, much more all-rounder than other IEMS in the range. Moreover, with the advantage of possessing a remarkable technical ability based on its concise, precise and resolute sound. The male voices do not appear complete, but they remain a step and a half away from the listener. Enough to be observed with clarity, feeling their body and half physicality. They don’t feel thin, nor do I seem to observe that hollow feeling I usually abhor. Without being completely full, they possess a fairly full timbre, which doesn’t make them thin, nor do they sound more organic and analog, very close to neutral.
The female voices gain in prominence, but are equally measured in the aspects of tonality and timbre. By gaining that half-step, they feel closer to the listener, but remain free of sibilance, performing in a very clean, clear and transparent way.
Again, I must emphasize the naturalness in the execution of the upper midrange. I think Simgot has found a very good balance, moving away from brighter profiles, as in the big EA1000s, to find a very versatile, pleasant, smooth, yet explicit and informative midrange. He’s packed more meat into the bass to lower midrange transition, but also thinned out the upper mids to balance the midrange in a very musical way. The result is a double gain, maintaining resolution richness while gaining stability, weighting and timbral restraint. In this way, both the instrumentation and the voices are more profuse, lush and rich. The central range is copious and nourished, being too dense or busy, as there is plenty of room on the stage to expand.

 

 

Treble

 

I think the EW300s have been tuned to achieve a smooth finish with the golden mouthpiece, with a relatively controlled transition between upper mids and first treble. And so it is, the sibilances tend to zero and the first highs are sweeter, moderately well extended, with a good amount of harmonics, but without becoming penetrating, incisive or too energetic. All this implies a more relaxed listening (more demanding with the silver mouthpiece) and this is new for Simgot. As with the EW200s, it seems that this new path of more affordable IEMS may have a more musical, all-terrain and smooth tendency.
On the other hand, the combination of drivers for the high end may give a somewhat drier look on the high notes, and perhaps not the most resolving level here either. At some point, the timbre may feel subtly impaired by the behavior of these transducers.
Finally, I would like to comment on a certain limitation in the air area.

 

 

Soundstage, Separation

 

The scene is quite good, with a good width, noticeable lateral feel and decent height. It is not a completely open scene, but no congestion is noticeable. The perceptible sense of cleanliness, clarity and transparency gives a crisp impression of distance between elements. This characteristic does not clash with the musicality of the whole. In addition, its great fun factor, its remarkable versatility and its all-rounder character make it a set for everyday use.
Simgot has been known to squeeze the upper mids in such a way that his sound became excited, penetrating, incisive and splashy. He is adept at forcing situations of more analytical clarity, generating a very informative and expressive sound. But also more intense. With the EW300 and despite being a tribrid, Simgot has found a more restrained and organic profile. It does not possess as much expressiveness as its big brothers. While its level of macro detail jumps out, the micro detail is lost a bit more in the background of the music, being less discernible (the silver mouthpiece can subtly improve this aspect). On the other hand, it remains accurate, with a well-formed, defined image without artifice. This is not an analytical ensemble, the background is not the darkest as there is a latent cohesive feel. But it maintains a good balance in many technical aspects.

 

 

Comparisons

 

KZ ZS10 Pro 2 1111

 

The classic and popular Chi-Fi brand KZ, put on the market a good sequel called ZS10 Pro 2. Many last names, as usual in successive versions. In addition, these KZ have 4 micro switches to give more versatility to their sound. In the all ON position (1111 as I like to say) there is a clear resemblance to the EW300 with the golden mouthpiece. There is no doubt that the KZ are more economical, with 56$, they have that clear typical KZ design, with a resin capsule and open metal plate on the outside, with its semi custom shape, thicker to house the switches and the 5 drivers. The presentation is very simple, with a very fair, cheap headphone cable. The appearance of the mouthpiece seems fragile as well. Nothing to do with the EW300, metallic, with a careful design, smaller, with better cable (although it is not a marvel either, but it does not scream “change me”). The ergonomics are not bad in either model and although the EW300 are heavier, I prefer their fit as they are smaller. In the non-sound aspects, the Simgot clearly outperform the KZ. We are talking about a price of $70, $14 more, not a fortune.
In the sonic aspects you can see that both FRs are very similar. The EW300s have a bit more body in the mid bass and in the first half of the midrange. In the upper midrange they are more restrained and also in the treble, having less air and extension than the KZ. The KZs are more sensitive and at the same volume they sound louder.
FR aside, the KZs have a thinner and sharper sound, with a brighter and less dense feel. The EW300s sound relatively darker, denser, but also silkier.
I was surprised by the bass performance of the KZs, with very good behavior, darkness, density, naturalness and technical skill. The EW300s have all that and then some. A little more volume, a denser and deeper feel. It also has a little more volume and a little more power. The KZs have a little more color and are a little drier, subtly more concise. Very low frequency pure tone performance is slightly better on the Simgot, sounding a bit more natural and a bit better behaved.
In the mids, the first part is thinner and lighter in the KZs, giving the sensation of less body and less physicality. Although the proximity of the male voices is patent, thanks to the greater sense of finesse, cleanliness and transparency of the notes. The KZs are somewhat more detailed and analytical, with a point more separation. While the EW300s are warmer, more cohesive and a bit more blended.
In the upper mids the KZs are more splashy, maintaining that finer, lighter feel of their notes, accentuating that greater sense of sparkle, clarity and definition. The EW300s do not have as much definition, but their timbre and tone is more natural, full, musical and enjoyable. The KZs offer more punchy notes that become a bit unpleasant over time. The EW300s wrap the mids in a silky, harmonious richness, offering a more mellow, calm and enjoyable response.
While the first part of the treble has similarities in both models, the harmonics are more restrained and smoother in the Simgot. The KZs sound more crisp, energetic and punchy, while the EW300s are drier, with less power, a bit thicker and less extended. Both Simgot’s PZT and KZ’s BA drivers offer different treble reproduction. But I’ll stick with the Simgot’s high end performance, despite their characteristics.
The EW300s have a slightly wider soundstage, with a bit more depth and volume in it. The KZs are a bit more volatile with a bit cleaner separation.
Macro detail is obvious in the KZs, with a hint of micro detail. In the Simgot, the macro detail is more natural, not as pronounced, but clearly discernible. On the other hand, the micro detail feels more diluted.
Overall, the sound of the Simgot EW300 is more balanced, harmonious, musical, full, dense, powerful and enjoyable than the KZ. Only if the enthusiast likes to play with the switches, looks for a sharper, crunchier sound, like the one offered by the BA’s of the KZ’s, I can understand their purchase.

 

 

Conclusion

 

I like the Simgot in this price range. If I already thought the EW200s were good, the EW300s are an improved version of those. Including a tribrid configuration of drivers (1DD+1Planar+1PZT), the EW300s maintain that profile that mixes the H-2019 curve and Simgot’s Target Gold, which fits my preferences very well. The Simgot EW300s have a fairly full, dense, well-balanced, musical and pleasant sound. Sibilance tends to zero and maintains a smoothness between the upper mids and first treble. This harmony makes the EW300 a very versatile model, all-rounder and ready to be used for many long sessions. The bass is practically canonical. I don’t notice that hollowness that irritates me in the first part of the midrange and the upper mids stay away from shouting and harshness. On the other hand, the two filters allow us to emphasize or limit the energy level in the high and upper part, to adjust it to our preferences. But, the gold filter achieves a more placid and calm sound, maintaining that sense of cleanliness and clarity restrained, while rich and melodious.
On the physical side, Simgot maintains the design and metal construction of the capsules, adding those pixelated Love & X icons on each of them. Attached is the cable typical of the models immediately above, as well as its nice zippered case. Admittedly, there is a single set of tips. But, if I’m honest, the large Simgot tips are among the few I can take advantage of for my personal use. So, welcome to them.
Finally, with these two avenues of sonic profiling that Simgot follows in their IEMS, I’d like to see the brand look to improve the profile of the EW300s in the EA1000 range, see what they manage to do. My eyes and ears would point there without hesitation.

 

 

Sources Used During the Analysis

 

  • EPZ TP50.
  • Tempotec V3.
  • Burson Audio Playmate 2.
  • Aune X8 XVIII Magic DAC + EarMen ST-Amp.
  • Aune M1p.